🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume atomic discussions with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a complex route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his address to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the strikes began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently attempted to enforce their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final answer to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and tenets must be followed."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the nation in the wake of this invasion."