🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage may be the optimal choice for a bold scary movie about Jesus Christ, though not for the motivations some audiences could guess. In reality, Cage does not actually portray Jesus in The Carpenter’s Son: his role is listed simply as a craftsman. The actor is cast as a father figure within this tale, attempting to keep his beliefs as his son (portrayed by the young actor), their now-teenage foster child, starts to show miraculous gifts. Why it’s difficult to imagine a different leading star playing this part is that while the figure becomes burdened with multiple difficulties, Nicolas Cage appears nearly touchingly certain that the murky, grim small film is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Recent Career Choices

Nicolas Cage has been using that time more carefully in recent years. He yet stars in more movies than most regular audiences could possibly view — for instance, did you know that he has made three distinct frontier films in the past three years? — yet he also adds prestige independent films such as Dream Scenario, another notable movie, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be a similar project, as it’s genre-adjacent, possibly controversial, and approaches a campy-sounding description in a earnest manner.

The Film's Premise and Execution

Unfortunately, filmmaker the director fails to repay that serious attention. The film opens in a interestingly wandering place, positioned as drawing from an obscure religious text concerning the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their son relocate frequently, afraid of faith-based hostility or distrust over their son's unusual abilities. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. That continues when sinister entities attack the household in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start on the traditional religious challenge for the youth.

Occasionally, this production echoes an Exorcist-style horror film, but no one of the lead characters are directly possessed. On the contrary, they are more and more distant from one another, while these powers infect a local young woman (the actress, credited as “The Stranger”) that the son forms a relationship with, and provides everyone troubling visions of a bleak destiny. The Carpenter notably grapples with his position in the narrative, at times berating the son he doesn't completely grasp.

Discussion and Caution

The subject matter is prone to stir disagreement, and the director treats it with a lot of care — too much, perhaps. The concept of a young man dealing with his destined offering and lured by mysterious forces is certainly terrifying, but Nathan could be wary of appearing sensational and eager to indicate his aims, so he often retreats into gloomily threatening cinematography. The roles continually reflect — FKA Twigs, who showed real promise in a recent film update, surprisingly — yields her performance to her religious attire, at times punctuated by a few gnarly horror imagery.

Cage's Performance and Movie's Flaws

Meanwhile, the actor toy with just the sort of exaggerated performance that his ironic fans may desire. There is a moment (featured) in promotional material in which Cage erupts and screams “My faith has been shattered!” When this sort of theatrical release is a component of your biblical thriller, maybe a more openly absurd style would take better advantage of Cage’s willingness to go over the top if needed. On the other hand, the film is closer to the poorer straight-to-DVD movies he starred in over that period — apart from the B-movies so much as the dramas and ghost stories that always sound promising, and frequently include several notable Cage moments, but finally come across like, well, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Honestly, a number of those, though not as grand, were easier to view in general. At this point I must break my own dogma, not religious but professional: Previously, a respected mentor persuaded me to remove words like “boring” or “dull” from my film-criticism vocabulary. Such terms express scant but a individual and vaguely expressed restlessness, avoiding the duty of vibrantly communicating the thoughtful and feeling of watching a particular movie. It’s difficult to convey tedium without sounding boring oneself. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Explain further,” in other words.

But I must confess, I felt uninterested throughout The Carpenter’s Son. In its defense, it is a devotional type of boredom, not because The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but since it requires a kind of patient acceptance to watch it. At some point in the beginning, this feature enters a cyclic tempo of simmering anguish, and fails to